Q Review the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analyses for all six cases here Links to an external site.. Pick one of the six cases and read the complete business plan. Then, create a professional presentation in Kaltura suggesting how IT could be used to enhance the company’s strengths, lessen the company’s weaknesses, take advantage of the company’s opportunities, and / or mitigate the company’s threats. The same IT solution(s) might accomplish more than one objective in the business plan. In your presentation, please copy the SWOT analysis from the case and paste that on one of the slides. The presentation should include 2-4 slides to explain the case including an analysis of the characteristics of the institution in the case study. Please explain specifically how IT solves a problem and / or enables new options for the company. The total presentation should be about 8-10 slides, not including the title and reference slides. The reference slide should be in APA format. Internet references, as well as peer-reviewed journal articles, are fine. The references should include examples of other companies that have done something similar to support your recommendations. In-text citations are not required for this presentation. Your presentation should include a voice-over to explain your slides. Please submit your Kaltura video via the assignment link and also include a link to it on the discussion board. Rubric Presentation Rubric Presentation Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Purpose 25 pts Work stands out as exemplary, is accurately detailed, and reflects the assignment purpose. Presentation provides an in-depth, clear, and concise description of the topic. 23 pts Work is accurately detailed and reflects the assignment purpose. Presentation provides a clear and concise description of the topic. 21 pts Work mostly reflects the assignment purpose. Presentation provides adequate support to the topic. 19 pts Work marginally reflects the assignment purpose. Presentation provides only basic support to the topic. 17 pts Work does not reflect the assignment purpose. Presentation does not address or minimally addresses topic. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIT Knowledge and Critical Thinking 25 pts Demonstrates an in-depth understanding of IT. Describes creative and insightful IT ideas associated with the SWOT analysis. 23 pts Demonstrates a good understanding of IT and applies IT to the SWOT analysis. 21 pts Demonstrates a good understanding of IT, but may have difficulty applying IT to the SWOT analysis. 19 pts Demonstrates a marginal understanding of IT as associated with the SWOT analysis. 17 pts Does not demonstrate an understanding of IT associated with the SWOT analysis. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Style 25 pts The presentation is visually attractive and the slides enhance the message being communicated. Overall, the presentation is very professionally done. 23 pts The presentation is visually attractive, and easy to read and follow. 21 pts The presentation is visually plain, but easy to read and follow. 19 pts The presentation is visually plain, and hard to read or follow. 17 pts The presentation is visually unattractive and the slides detract from the message being communicated. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling, Grammas, Punctuation 15 pts No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent 13.9 pts Presentation contains 1 or 2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors 12.9 pts Presentation contains 3 or 4 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors 11.9 pts Presentation contains 5 or 6 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors 10.9 pts Presentation is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA references 10 pts No APA error for references are readily apparent 9.4 pts References contain 1 or 2 different APA errors. 8.7 pts References contain 3 or 4 different APA errors. 8 pts References contain 5 or 6 different APA errors. 7.3 pts References are riddled with APA errors 10 pts Total Points: 100